Barked: Tue Jul 24, '12 12:03am PST |
 |  |  |  | On the other hand, it makes quite a good case for why your dogs should never be at large even if they're the sweetest, gentlest dog. Other people's dogs might not be so much. If everyone's dog was on lead, there wouldn't be this issue at all. The dog shouldn't be deemed dangerous, and that lady's dog should be equally tested for temperament, but shadow's owners are still at fault unless there is no leash ordinance.I'd say a fine for a dog at large is in order, but not a kill order or a dangerous dog order. Then they can turn around and try to sue the lady for falsifying a report, pain and suffering, boarding fees, etc. Reporting a bite a month after the issue is right out. That is supposed to be a 72 hour reporting window or it's frivolous and abusive of the system. The lady probably doesn't want to admit that her dog is a biter, and doesn't want to pay for the medical bills. |  |  |  |  |
|
my posts | my page | msg me | my family's posts | gift me | become pals | [notify] |